Internal Tool Development Platforms

Rank App Description Tags Stars
1 appsmithorg/appsmith Platform to build admin panels, internal tools, and dashboards. Integrates with 25+ databases and any API. self-hosted react automation low-code typescript hacktoberfest javascript admin-dashboard admin-panels app-builder crud custom-internal developer-tools gui gui-application internal-tools java low-code-framework webdevelopment workflows 31452
2 ToolJet/ToolJet Low-code platform for building business applications. Connect to databases, cloud storages, GraphQL, API endpoints, Airtable, Google sheets, OpenAI, etc and build apps using drag and drop application builder. Built using JavaScript/TypeScript. 🚀 self-hosted nestjs nodejs docker openai low-code low-code-development-platform typescript hacktoberfest javascript internal-tools low-code-framework internal-applications internal-project internal-tool kubernetes no-code reactjs typeorm web-development-tools 26546
3 illacloud/illa-builder Low-code platform allows you to build business apps, enables you to quickly create internal tools such as dashboard, crud app, admin panel, crm, cms, etc. Supports PostgreSQL, MySQL, Supabase, GraphQL, MongoDB, MSSQL, Rest API, Hugging Face, Redis, etc. Automate workflows with schedule or webhook. Open source Retool. self-hosted react low-code low-code-development-platform typescript hacktoberfest app-builder developer-tools gui internal-tools internal-tool aiagent crud-application developer-tool internal-development lowcode 10404

Internal Tool Development Platforms (ITDP) is an open-source set of tools designed to help organizations create customized software solutions in-house. These tools include various programming languages, such as Python and Java, along with a variety of pre-built libraries and frameworks. ITDP is built on the principle of "build once, use many times", meaning that you only need to develop your tool once, but can reuse it across multiple projects.

One of the main advantages of using ITDP is that it allows organizations to build software solutions tailored specifically to their needs, without having to rely on pre-made software from third-party vendors. This can result in significant cost savings and a more efficient use of resources. Additionally, because ITDP is open-source software, it is constantly evolving and improving with the contributions of developers from around the world.

Overall, Internal Tool Development Platforms is an excellent option for organizations looking to create customized software solutions that meet their unique needs, while also being cost-effective and efficient.

You are a Quality Assurance Engineer at a software company developing internal tool development platform (ITDP). The platform has three primary components:

  1. Python libraries for data processing
  2. Java frameworks for user interface design
  3. A custom-built SQL database for backend storage

Your team is currently working on testing these components, and the following statements are provided:

Statement 1: If a component is functional, then it's either a Python library or a Java framework. Statement 2: All functional components are reliable. Statement 3: Not all reliable components are custom-built SQL databases.

Question: Can we conclude from the above statements that any non-custom-built SQL database is not reliable?

Let's first consider Statement 1, "If a component is functional, then it's either a Python library or a Java framework". This means if a software component works as intended (is 'functional'), it can be either a Python library or a Java framework. We also know from the conversation that the SQL database is a software component too.

Now, let's examine Statement 2, "All functional components are reliable." This statement suggests that any component which works as intended (is 'functional') is also reliable. However, this doesn't imply that every non-custom-built SQL database (which we know isn't the case) will be reliable.

Finally, let's analyze Statement 3: "Not all reliable components are custom-built SQL databases". This means that some software components which work as intended can still fail to be reliable because they aren't built into a custom-built SQL database. Since the SQL database is not a reliable component (as it isn’t always used), we cannot conclude that any non-custom-built SQL database is unreliable.

Answer: No, we cannot conclude from these statements that any non-custom-built SQL database is not reliable.